This analysis shows that People's Daily is able to win over its readers by portraying itself as representative of the public, becoming more attuned to its readership, and establishing itself as a necessary important opinion leader. People's Daily challenges the credibility of the news industry by providing readers with content that is both brief and highly charged. As a result, without knowing the full context and driving forces behind the information, people are more likely to experience frustration. Furthermore, the tendency to adapt to fragmented information is problematic. People Daily routinely chooses positive comments underneath sensitive subjects, which raises suspicions that the paper is trying to unite public opinion. The Supreme Court, in its current aggressive stance, has introduced the idea of rationality to address the limitations of the conventional method. It has been theorized that the attitude of the Judiciary toward the media stems from their desire to seem independent, unbiased, and in the role of observers rather than players in the political arena, all of which have been neglected in the past but are now properly addressed thanks to the development of new concepts. To help the public assess the Judiciary's effectiveness, the media discloses publicly available information.

social media, People’s Daily, Mainstream Media, Judicial Activism, Judicial Review