This study examined the impact of coaching styles on the mental and physical wellness of student-athletes. Using a descriptive survey design, data were collected from 100 student-athletes through structured questionnaires. Results indicated that the democratic coaching style was the most commonly experienced (52%), followed by authoritarian (38%) and laissez-faire (10%). ANOVA revealed significant effects of coaching styles on mental wellness variables such as anxiety (F(2, 97) = 4.72, p = .011), stress (F(2, 97) = 3.89, p = .024), and self-esteem (F(2, 97) = 6.58, p = .002), highlighting the psychological influence of coaching methods. Also, coaching styles significantly influenced injury rates (F(2, 100) = 4.78, p = .011, η² = .09), physical fitness (F(2, 100) = 5.65, p = .005, η² = .105), and nutrition (F(2, 100) = 3.92, p = .023, η² = .075). Student-athletes also perceived their coaches positively on fairness (M = 4.05, SD = 0.79) and communication (M = 3.95, SD = 0.86), though lower ratings were given for involvement in decision-making. The findings suggest that democratic coaching promotes better wellness outcomes. The study recommends adopting democratic coaching approaches, integrating mental health support into training, and providing professional development for coaches to improve athlete well-being.

Coaching Style, Student-Athletes, Mental Wellness, and Physical Wellness